Developed by the Center for Rural Education SUNY College
at Potsdam
"5. The potential of the evaluation plan for assessing the effectiveness of the professional development in making changes in instruction in the classroom.
· Describe how the professional development activities are
evaluated...
· Describe surveys or instruments used for teacher feed-back
and evaluation...
The table below addresses the above requests.
Objective
Mechanism or Tool
Focus or Questions
| To train teachers to change classroom practice so that it is aligned with standards based curriculum and the new assessments | 1) Workshop, Summer 2000
2) Workshop evaluation 3) In-class observations 4) Teacher survey 5) Student products 6) Internet course records |
1) Identification of Internet courses
2) Teacher satisfaction with workshop presentations are collected 3) Determine which of the standards are being addressed, and how assessments are structured. 4) Questions will be designed to identify the standards heing addressed in the classroom. 5) Products will be evaluated for evidence that the student is meeting the standards and multiple forms of assessment are being used 6) Degree to which courses encourage effective strategies; rate of utilization of courses by participants |
| To train teachers to effectively
integrate technology into classroom activities, and to utilize technology for record keeping, planning, networking with colleagues, and creating opportunities for their students to collaborate and network with students in other areas. |
1) Workshop, Summer 2000
2) Internet course 3) Teacher survey |
1) Strategies of utilizing technology in teaching and learning are
presented.
2) Degree to which Internet courses are utilized by pilot teachers 3) Compilation of collaborative projects using technology |
| To engage classroom and special education teachers with
strategies to meet the needs of
all students simultaneously. |
1) Workshop, Summer 2000
2) Teacher survey 3) In-class observations |
1) Strategies will be modeled for project participants.
2) Frequency of use of specific strategies will be compiled 3) Identify the strategies being utilized |
| To involve universities in the
planning process to assure that the staff development approaches in this project are research based and data driven. |
1) Workshop, Summer 2000
2) Planning sessions throughout the year |
1) Notes of planning meetings
2) Notes of planning meetings |
| To design university/school partnership activities for widespread replication | 1) Participant survey | 1) Descriptions of collaborative agreements among participants |
| To engage teachers with strategies to make students more responsible and accountable for their own learning | 1) Workshop, Summer 2000 2) Classroom observation | Identify effective strategies
Assessment tool listing effective strategies |
| To involve parents as equal partners in the education of their children and as valuable resources for the learner centered classroom. | 1) Participant survey | 1) Designed to collect descriptions of parent involvement in the classrooms |
| To increase student motivation to engage in learning activities and to increase student achievement. | 1) Student project records
|
1) Designed to collect project descriptions plus student participation
and level of commitment records
|
"...Describe the process and timeline for on-going collection of data.
Summer 2000 Workshop evaluations collected and analyzed
Sept-Oct 2000 Surveys for teacher implementation of standards based strategies and projects and in-class observation checklists are developed.
Nov-Dec 2000 First distribution of surveys and beginning of in-class observations by assessment team. Data analyzed to provide focus for follow-up workshops.
Feb- Mar 2001 Second distribution of surveys and continuing in-class observations.
Apr-Jun 2001 Data analyzed for evidence of change in classroom practice and to provide focus for subsequent years.
"... Describe how ongoing reflection, analysis and modification support changes in the classrooms brought about by these activities."
The data being collected throughout the year is summarized and provided
to the project directors for use in creating staff development activities
and Internet courses. The process is on-going and iterative, which each
analysis leading to new questions to explore. With the purpose of the grant
to develop models of professional development, long-term records of public
school classroom teacher participation will be a measure of diffusion.
Additionally, standard state assessments will be monitored for levels of
achievement by those students in the participating classrooms. It is anticipated
that such monitoring will occur longitudinally over at least a three-year
period.
Click on the next page you would like to view: