Appendix A    ADDRESSING RFP CRITERIA, PAGES 3 and 4

1. The degree to which the proposed plan .   .    .
The content of our professional development activities models the changes in teaching and learning and is designed to enable teachers to become facilitators of learning.  During the week-long training we conducted, for participants in this project, at the summer constructivist  conference at SLU it was evident to anyone who visited that the 35 teachers, parents and administrators on the six PGP teams, along with the many pilot teachers, facilitators and resource people were a community of learners, functioning as we would like a classroom of students to function with their teacher/facilitator.  Every teacher departed the week-long training in early August with a written plan and timeline which demonstrated how they would change classroom practice to align it with the descriptors of a learner centered/standards focused classroom. Each teacher received feedback on his/her plan and met for an additional two days in late August to revise the plan. At the full day sessions scheduled throughout the year, project teachers will be required to provide student evidence of success with their teaching strategies, and they will continually revise their time line and plans, under the direction of project facilitators. Building principals of participating schools met for a day in August and are committed to three full day meetings during the year. They are on an electronic network that keeps them informed of project undertakings and affords them the opportunity to communicate with each other and become their own support system. Participating school superintendents are committed to a half day session. Also, at the full day sessions with building principals, they are required to leave with a plan for their own behaviors (as instructional leaders) and that plan includes steps to keep the superintendent informed and supportive. The steps to assure teacher participation are simple: we schedule all sessions for the entire year before the school year begins, have obtained a commitment from every building principal and superintendent to support release time or whatever is necessary for teacher participation, and we have built funds into the grant for stipends, resources, and substitute teachers, where necessary.

2. The degree to which changes in classroom instruction are targeted.    .    .
It should be evident from the narrative that instructional technology and addressing the needs of students with disabilities are integrated into the fabric of all of our professional development.  The project Web Site is evolving into one of the most progressive educational web sites in the world. Utilizing the web site for teacher self assessment and training (Internet courses) is having the ripple benefit of familiarizing a large number of teachers with technology that they may now be more comfortable using in the classroom.  The plans designed by project teachers must address use of technology in the classroom and the needs of students with disabilities.

3. The degree to which research on  professional development.      .       .      .
David Johnson contends that research goes back 200 years substantiating the need for people to learn through group study. Giselle Martin Kniepp who is conducting much of the assessment training for New York State frequently cites the need for professional development that models the strategies required of facilitative teachers. Fred Neumann of Wisconsin advocates for authentic task/assessment as nurtured in our proposed pilot project. Dr. Ann Martin of Cornell argues for changing the culture of a school if you want to restructure educational practice. Through project evaluations, and anecdotal from teachers and administrators in the project, there is evidence of improved student learning and achievement.

4. The degree to which the proposed program for professional development will be integrated. .   .    .Lead agency Massena is using its CDEP to guide the professional development in this Initiative and is modeling the use of a CDEP to guide education reform for the partner schools.  Every participating school has been required to use data to drive its planning and to integrate the professional development in this project with its PDP. The work of our PGP schools constitutes a Professional Development Plan for their schools.

Click on the next page you would like to view:

Home - Cover - CoverA - Grant Table of Contents - Letters of Support Index
- 1 - 2 -3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11- 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44- 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 - 52 - 53 - 54 - 55- 56 - 57 - 58 -59 - 60 - 61 - 62 - 63 - 64 - 65 - 66 - 67- 68 - 69 - 70 - 71 - 72 - 73 - 74 - 75 - 76 - 77 - 78 - 79 - 80 - 81 - 82 - 83 - 84 - 85 - 86 - 87 - 88 - 89 - 90 - 91 - 92 - 93 - 94 - 95 - 96 - 97 - 98 - 99 - 100 - 101 - 102 - 103 - 104 - Grant Artwork